|
SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Abgarjan D.
The Place of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in progressive development of the law of the sea
// SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.
2014. № 4.
С. 307-315.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=66007
Abgarjan D. The Place of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in progressive development of the law of the sea
Аннотация:
The author of this presentation sees it her task to find out, whether the ITLOS has helped to systematize the law of the sea, to make its rules more clear and obligations of states stemming therefrom more precise. The methodology of this paper is to undertake the analysis of the following questions: to begin with the general capacity of international courts to promote development of international law; then to light up the special place of ITLOS in the development of the law of the sea; to analyze the work by ITLOS on the law of the sea rules in different spheres of the ocean activity case by case; and to conclude. A very special place occupied by the International Tribunal for the of the Sea in progressive development of the law of the sea is dicussed in the article. It is submitted that ITLOS follows the ways and methods of the ICJ in the process. No other judicial body is capable to analize in detail rules of the law of the sea neither can influence positions of states.
Ключевые слова:
International Tribunal, progressive development, international law, ICJ, international judicial bodies, ITLOS, rules, positions of states, influence, the Sea
Abstract: The author of this presentation sees it her task to find out, whether the
ITLOS has helped to systematize the law of the sea, to make its rules more clear
and obligations of states stemming therefrom more precise. The methodology
of this paper is to undertake the analysis of the following questions: to begin
with the general capacity of international courts to promote development of
international law; then to light up the special place of ITLOS in the development
of the law of the sea; to analyze the work by ITLOS on the law of the sea rules in
different spheres of the ocean activity case by case; and to conclude. A very special
place occupied by the International Tribunal for the of the Sea in progressive
development of the law of the sea is dicussed in the article. It is submitted that
ITLOS follows the ways and methods of the ICJ in the process. No other judicial
body is capable to analize in detail rules of the law of the sea neither can influence
positions of states.
Keywords: International Tribunal, progressive development, international law, ICJ, international judicial bodies, ITLOS, rules, positions of states, influence, the Sea
Эта статья может быть бесплатно загружена в формате PDF для чтения. Обращаем ваше внимание на необходимость соблюдения авторских прав,
указания библиографической ссылки на статью при цитировании.
Скачать статью
Библиография
1. Scott R., Stephan P.B. Self-Enforcing International Agreements and the Limits of Coercion// Wis. L. Rev. 551.V. 2004, 2004. P.580-8.
2. Irwin P. C. Settlement of maritime boundary disputes. An analysis of the law of the sea negotiations // Ocean Dev. and internat. L. 1980. Vol. 8. P. 105—148.
3. Saxena J. N. Limits of compulsory jurisdiction in respect of the law of the sea disputes // Law of the sea. Caracas and beyond / Ed. by R. P. Anand. The Hague; Boston; L., 1980.
4. Lauterpacht H. The development of international law by the International Court. L., 1958.
5. Sohn L. V.Problems of dispute settlement // Law of the sea: conference outcomes and problems of implementation. Proceedings of the law of the sea Institute tenth annual conference. Cambridge (Mass.), 1977. P. 223—232.
6. Kamarowskii L.A. Le Tribunal International (Sergei Westman trans.), P., 1887, p.529.
7. Ginsburg T. Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking, in: Virginia Journal of International Law. Va. J. Int'l L. V.45, Spring, 2005.P.638.
8. Hudson M. O. International tribunals: past and future. N.Y., 1944.
9. John Merrils, The Means of Dispute Settlement, in: Malcolm D.Evans, ed., International Law, second edition, 2006, p.546
10. Safferling Ch. J. M. Towards an international criminal procedure. Oxford University Press, 2001.
11. Schabas W.A. Genocide Trials and Gacaca Courts. //Journal of International Criminal Justice. V.3, 2005.
12. A. A. Todorov. Territorial'nyy element sostava piratstva po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 10. – S. 104-107.
13. M. R. Khubieva. Konkurentsiya yurisdiktsiy v sluchae predpisaniya vremennykh mer pravovoy zashchity pri razreshenii mezhdunarodnykh morskikh sporov // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
14. A. S. Kasatkina. Pravovye osnovy regulirovaniya mezhdunarodnykh passazhirskikh perevozok // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
15. G. Ts. Li. Morskaya politika Kitaya v regione ATR // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 104-107.
16. S. N. Ovchinnikov. Pogranichnyy kontrol' morskikh sudov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: zakonodatel'stvo i praktika // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – № 12. – S. 104-107.
17. M. M. Kalenchenko. Territorial'naya okhrana morskoy sredy i svoboda sudokhodstva. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 2.
18. Li Guan' tsyun'. Kitayskaya morskaya strategiya i politika na sovremennom etape // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 104-107.
19. V. N. Konyshev, A. A. Sergunin. Remilitarizatsiya Arktiki i bezopasnost' Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
20. E. B. Ganyushkina. Mezhdunarodnyy organ po morskomu dnu, Komissiya po granitsam kontinental'nogo shel'fa, Mezhdunarodnyy tribunal po morskomu pravu i nekotorye drugie mezhdunarodnye ob"edineniya,svyazannye s Konventsiey OON po morskomu pravu 1982 g. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 4.
21. A.M. Ibragimov. Spetsifika norm o garantiyakh v mezhdunarodnom morskom i rechnom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – № 9.
22. Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh: pravovye osnovy funktsionirovaniya // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.1-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.545. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_545.html
23. Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
24. Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiyskoy Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoy zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
25. Kuz'mina Yu.A. Nekotorye osobennosti praktiki Evropeyskogo Suda v otnoshenii Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.68-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.2424. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2424.htm
References
1. Scott R., Stephan P.B. Self-Enforcing International Agreements and the Limits of Coercion// Wis. L. Rev. 551.V. 2004, 2004. P.580-8.
2. Irwin P. C. Settlement of maritime boundary disputes. An analysis of the law of the sea negotiations // Ocean Dev. and internat. L. 1980. Vol. 8. P. 105—148.
3. Saxena J. N. Limits of compulsory jurisdiction in respect of the law of the sea disputes // Law of the sea. Caracas and beyond / Ed. by R. P. Anand. The Hague; Boston; L., 1980.
4. Lauterpacht H. The development of international law by the International Court. L., 1958.
5. Sohn L. V.Problems of dispute settlement // Law of the sea: conference outcomes and problems of implementation. Proceedings of the law of the sea Institute tenth annual conference. Cambridge (Mass.), 1977. P. 223—232.
6. Kamarowskii L.A. Le Tribunal International (Sergei Westman trans.), P., 1887, p.529.
7. Ginsburg T. Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking, in: Virginia Journal of International Law. Va. J. Int'l L. V.45, Spring, 2005.P.638.
8. Hudson M. O. International tribunals: past and future. N.Y., 1944.
9. John Merrils, The Means of Dispute Settlement, in: Malcolm D.Evans, ed., International Law, second edition, 2006, p.546
10. Safferling Ch. J. M. Towards an international criminal procedure. Oxford University Press, 2001.
11. Schabas W.A. Genocide Trials and Gacaca Courts. //Journal of International Criminal Justice. V.3, 2005.
12. A. A. Todorov. Territorial'nyy element sostava piratstva po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 10. – S. 104-107.
13. M. R. Khubieva. Konkurentsiya yurisdiktsiy v sluchae predpisaniya vremennykh mer pravovoy zashchity pri razreshenii mezhdunarodnykh morskikh sporov // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
14. A. S. Kasatkina. Pravovye osnovy regulirovaniya mezhdunarodnykh passazhirskikh perevozok // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
15. G. Ts. Li. Morskaya politika Kitaya v regione ATR // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 104-107.
16. S. N. Ovchinnikov. Pogranichnyy kontrol' morskikh sudov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: zakonodatel'stvo i praktika // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – № 12. – S. 104-107.
17. M. M. Kalenchenko. Territorial'naya okhrana morskoy sredy i svoboda sudokhodstva. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 2.
18. Li Guan' tsyun'. Kitayskaya morskaya strategiya i politika na sovremennom etape // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 104-107.
19. V. N. Konyshev, A. A. Sergunin. Remilitarizatsiya Arktiki i bezopasnost' Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
20. E. B. Ganyushkina. Mezhdunarodnyy organ po morskomu dnu, Komissiya po granitsam kontinental'nogo shel'fa, Mezhdunarodnyy tribunal po morskomu pravu i nekotorye drugie mezhdunarodnye ob"edineniya,svyazannye s Konventsiey OON po morskomu pravu 1982 g. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 4.
21. A.M. Ibragimov. Spetsifika norm o garantiyakh v mezhdunarodnom morskom i rechnom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – № 9.
22. Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh: pravovye osnovy funktsionirovaniya // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.1-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.545. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_545.html
23. Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
24. Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiyskoy Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoy zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
25. Kuz'mina Yu.A. Nekotorye osobennosti praktiki Evropeyskogo Suda v otnoshenii Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.68-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.2424. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2424.htm
|
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
