Перевести страницу на:  
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Библиотека
ваш профиль

Вернуться к содержанию

SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Правильная ссылка на статью:

Bajrektarevic A. The Caspian 5 and Arctic 5 – Critical Similarities

Аннотация: While the world’s attention remains focused on Ukraine, Crimea is portrayed as its hotbed. No wonder as this peninsula is an absolutely pivotal portion of the Black Sea theatre for the very survival of the Black Sea fleet to both Russia and Ukraine. In the larger context, it revels the old chapters of history books full of overt and covert struggles between Atlantic–Central Europe and Russophone Europe for influence and strategic depth extension over the playground called Eastern Europe. However, there are two other vital theatres for these same protagonists, both remaining underreported and less elaborated. Author brings an interesting account on Caspian and Artic, by contrasting and comparing them. He claims that both water plateaus are of utmost geopolitical as well as of geo-economic (biota, energy, transport) importance, and that Caspian and Arctic will considerably influence passions and imperatives of any future mega geopolitical strategies – far more than Black Sea could have ever had.


Ключевые слова:

Politics, Geopolitics, Caspian, Arctic, Sea, Europe, Asia, International relations, State, Similarities

Abstract: While the world’s attention remains focused on Ukraine, Crimea is portrayed as its hotbed. No wonder as this peninsula is an absolutely pivotal portion of the Black Sea theatre for the very survival of the Black Sea fleet to both Russia and Ukraine. In the larger context, it revels the old chapters of history books full of overt and covert struggles between Atlantic–Central Europe and Russophone Europe for influence and strategic depth extension over the playground called Eastern Europe. However, there are two other vital theatres for these same protagonists, both remaining underreported and less elaborated. Author brings an interesting account on Caspian and Artic, by contrasting and comparing them. He claims that both water plateaus are of utmost geopolitical as well as of geo-economic (biota, energy, transport) importance, and that Caspian and Arctic will considerably influence passions and imperatives of any future mega geopolitical strategies – far more than Black Sea could have ever had.


Keywords:

Politics, Geopolitics, Caspian, Arctic, Sea, Europe, Asia, International relations, State, Similarities


Эта статья может быть бесплатно загружена в формате PDF для чтения. Обращаем ваше внимание на необходимость соблюдения авторских прав, указания библиографической ссылки на статью при цитировании.

Скачать статью

Библиография
1. A. M. Temirbulatov. Geopoliticheskie protivorechiya strategicheskogo razvitiya Kaspiiskogo regiona // Politika i Obshchestvo. — 2012. — № 3. — S. 104–107.
2. A. S. Laletina. Transgranichnye gazoprovody na territorii Turkmenistana: pravovye aspekty // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. — 2011. — №  3.
3.  — S. 104–107. 3. V. V. Maleev. Energeticheskie interesy Rossii v Kaspiiskom regione // Natsional’naya bezopasnost’ / nota bene. — 2011. — № 3. — S. 104–107.
4. A. T. Abakarov. Kaspiiskii region v global’noi strategii v usloviyakh novogo geopoliticheskogo prostranstva. // Pravo i politika. — 2007. — № 11.
5. R. Mamedov. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya delimitatsiya Kaspiiskogo morya (okonchanie). // Pravo i politika. — 2001. — № 5.
6. R. Mamedov. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya delimitatsiya Kaspiiskogo morya. // Pravo i politika. — 2001. — № 4.
7. R. Mamedov. Sovremennyi mezhdunarodno-pravovoi status Kaspiiskogo morya: politika, diplomatiya i pravo. // Pravo i politika. — 2001. — № 
References
1. A. M. Temirbulatov. Geopoliticheskie protivorechiya strategicheskogo razvitiya Kaspiiskogo regiona // Politika i Obshchestvo. — 2012. — № 3. — S. 104–107.
2. A. S. Laletina. Transgranichnye gazoprovody na territorii Turkmenistana: pravovye aspekty // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. — 2011. — №  3.
3.  — S. 104–107. 3. V. V. Maleev. Energeticheskie interesy Rossii v Kaspiiskom regione // Natsional’naya bezopasnost’ / nota bene. — 2011. — № 3. — S. 104–107.
4. A. T. Abakarov. Kaspiiskii region v global’noi strategii v usloviyakh novogo geopoliticheskogo prostranstva. // Pravo i politika. — 2007. — № 11.
5. R. Mamedov. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya delimitatsiya Kaspiiskogo morya (okonchanie). // Pravo i politika. — 2001. — № 5.
6. R. Mamedov. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya delimitatsiya Kaspiiskogo morya. // Pravo i politika. — 2001. — № 4.
7. R. Mamedov. Sovremennyi mezhdunarodno-pravovoi status Kaspiiskogo morya: politika, diplomatiya i pravo. // Pravo i politika. — 2001. — №