Перевести страницу на:  
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Библиотека
ваш профиль

Вернуться к содержанию

Налоги и налогообложение
Правильная ссылка на статью:

М.Л. Синицына Антикризисные меры ЕС. Анализ современных финансовых реформ

Аннотация: В статье рассмотрены актуальные нововведения и предложения в области налогообложения в ЕС в рамках антикризисного регулирования последних лет. Для проведения анализа автор предлагает условное разделение принимаемых мер на три направления: меры по усилению финансовой дисциплины в рамках Союза; изменения в налоговой системе ЕС и в системе собственных ресурсов, направленные на развитие гармонизации налогообложения и усиление бюджета ЕС; и меры в рамках оказания финансовой поддержки отдельным государствам – членам, особенно пострадавшим в результате кризиса. На основе изложенного в статье материала автор приходит к выводу о том, что все изученные меры принимаются во взаимосвязи друг с другом и преследуют общую цель, состоящую в сохранении экономического единства и силы ЕС как конкурентоспособного участника мирового рынка. Кроме того, направленность принимаемых мер подтверждает тенденцию к централизации налоговой сферы на общеевропейском пространстве и развитию системы налогового федерализма в ЕС.


Ключевые слова:

Налоги и налогообложение, ЕС, кризис, реформа, финансовая дисциплина, налог, НДС, фонд, интеграция, федерализация

Abstract: The article is devoted to actual innovations and improvements in the sphere of taxation in the EU as a part of anti-crisis regulation over the past years. In order to carry out the analysis, the author suggests the conventional division of all undertaken measures into the three groups: measures aimed at reinforcement of financial discipline within the Union; changes in the EU system of taxation and system of own resources aimed at harmonization of taxation and reinforcement of the EU budget; and measures aimed at financially supporting certain member states that especially suffered from the crisis. Based on her research, the author concludes that all the studied measures should be interpreted from the point of view of their relations with one another, and all of these measures have the same purpose to keep the economic unity and forces of the EU as a competitive participant of the global market. Moreover, the nature of these measures evidently show that there is a certain tendency towards centralization of tax sphere in the territory of Europe and development of the system of tax federalism in the EU.


Keywords:

taxes and taxation, European Union (EU), crisis, reform, financial discipline, tax, value-added tax, fund, integration, federalization.


Эта статья может быть бесплатно загружена в формате PDF для чтения. Обращаем ваше внимание на необходимость соблюдения авторских прав, указания библиографической ссылки на статью при цитировании.

Скачать статью

Библиография
1. Ardy B. The EU Budget and EMU. European Institute. South Bank European Papers. No 1/2001.
2. Cash B. The Treaty on Stability, Co-ordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union is unlawful// Bill Cash's European Journal. 5 March 2012 (http://www.europeanfoundation. org/)
3. Financing the EU Budget: Report on the operation of the own resources system. Brussels, 27.10.2011// SEC(2011) 876-nal/2
4. Montero C. Moving away from unanimity. Ratification of the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union// RECON Online Working Paper 2011/38 December 2011.
5. Oates W. E. Fiscal Federalism and European Union: some Reflections// Italian Society of Public Economics. XIV Conference. 4-5 October 2002;
6. Sibert A. The EFSM and the EFSF: Now and what follows. September 2010. European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs// www.europarl. europa.eu/activities/committees/studies. do?language=EN
7. Schuknecht L., Moutot Ph., Rother Ph., Stark J. The Stability and Growth Pact. Crisis and Reform.// European Central Bank. Occasional Paper Series No. 129. September 2011.
8. van Riet, A. Euro Area Fiscal Policies and the Crisis// European Central Bank. Occasional Paper Series, No 109. April 2010.
9. Wells P. Multi-Level Governance and Economic Cohesion: a Critical Analysis of Fiscal Decentralization and Multi Level Governance. December 2008// http://www. cor.europa.eu/pages
References
1. Ardy B. The EU Budget and EMU. European Institute. South Bank European Papers. No 1/2001.
2. Cash B. The Treaty on Stability, Co-ordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union is unlawful// Bill Cash's European Journal. 5 March 2012 (http://www.europeanfoundation. org/)
3. Financing the EU Budget: Report on the operation of the own resources system. Brussels, 27.10.2011// SEC(2011) 876-nal/2
4. Montero C. Moving away from unanimity. Ratification of the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union// RECON Online Working Paper 2011/38 December 2011.
5. Oates W. E. Fiscal Federalism and European Union: some Reflections// Italian Society of Public Economics. XIV Conference. 4-5 October 2002;
6. Sibert A. The EFSM and the EFSF: Now and what follows. September 2010. European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs// www.europarl. europa.eu/activities/committees/studies. do?language=EN
7. Schuknecht L., Moutot Ph., Rother Ph., Stark J. The Stability and Growth Pact. Crisis and Reform.// European Central Bank. Occasional Paper Series No. 129. September 2011.
8. van Riet, A. Euro Area Fiscal Policies and the Crisis// European Central Bank. Occasional Paper Series, No 109. April 2010.
9. Wells P. Multi-Level Governance and Economic Cohesion: a Critical Analysis of Fiscal Decentralization and Multi Level Governance. December 2008// http://www. cor.europa.eu/pages