Библиотека
|
ваш профиль |
PHILHARMONICA. International Music Journal
Reference:
Lebedeva E.G.
Soul-image and an image in the creation of English pop musicians (70 to 80 years of XX century).
// PHILHARMONICA. International Music Journal.
2015. № 1.
P. 23-33.
DOI: 10.7256/2453-613X.2015.1.40183 URL: https://aurora-journals.com/library_read_article.php?id=40183
Образ и имидж в творчестве английских поп-музыкантов (70-80 – годы XX века).
DOI: 10.7256/2453-613X.2015.1.40183Received: Published: 16-06-2015Abstract: The subjects of study in this article are two concepts: soul-image and image. Offers the author's view on understanding the differences and similarities of these concepts. An attempt to explain the motivation of the choice. What meaning lies in them and that mean people who choose specific a soul- image, and creating a particular image. How important is it to have a creative soul-image and creative image for a popular artist, in particular, in English musical culture. The methodology of the study lies in the comparative analysis of these concepts using the known writings on the subject and personal observations of the author. The novelty of this work consists in introducing into the scientific circulation of creative soul-image and creative image, using as an example the images of popular English artists 70-80 years of XX century. However, the problem understanding of image has created a demand for an ongoing philosophical reflection, and the concept of "soul-image" requires further research. Keywords: soul-image, image, subculture, David Bowie, Marc Bolan, Ziggy Stardust, punk rock, new romance, Stephen Strange, Boy GeorgeReferences
1. Lukov V.A.. Osobennosti molodezhnykh subkul'tur v Rossii. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 6. 2002 g.)
2. oBOUIchina mira. «Devid Boui: sam sebe marionetka». http://www.vodesign.ru/smf1/index.php?topic=908.0 3. Istoriya goticheskoi subkul'tury. Chast' III. Neposredstvennye predshestvenniki. http://www.gothic.su/forum/archive/index.php/t-332.html 4. Subkul'tury. Stereotipy o subkul'ture. Sinopsis. http://www.gothic.su/forum/archive/index.php/t-201.html 5. Berdyaev Nikolai. Opyt eskhatologicheskoi metafiziki.C. 248,249// Biblioteka Yakova Krotova. http://krotov.info/library/02_b/berdyaev/1941_38_07.html 6. Perelygina E. B. Psikhologiya imidzha: Uchebnoe posobie. Razdel I. Paragraf №1: Ponyatie imidzha (s sokrashcheniyami). M.: Aspekt Press, 2002. Str. 11-23. – 233 s. 7. Caparov M. A. Slovesnyi obraz i zrimoe izobrazhenie (zhivopis' — fotografiya — slovo) //Literatura i zhivopis'. — L.: Nauka, 1982. — S.66-92. – 288 s. 8. Goncharov A. A. Poiski vyrazitel'nosti. Moi teatral'nye pristrastiya — M.: Iskusstvo, 1997. — T. 1. — S. 290. — 336 s. 9. Fedorkina A. P., Romashkina R. F. Problemy imidzha v kontekste sotsial'nogo psikhoanaliza // Imidzh gossluzhby. M., 1996. S. 694–696.– 701 s. 10. Kalyuzhnaya E.G. Imidzh : predystoriya i kul'turologicheskoe obosnovanie // Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vypusk 12. 2006. № 47. S. 45-52. 11. Spicheva D.I. Fenomen imidzha v sovremennykh nauchnykh issledovaniyakh. TGU. Kafedra sotsial'nykh kommunikatsii. (Elektronnyi resurs). http://pr.tsu.ru/articles/139 12. Belobragin V.Ya., Belobragin V.V. Nekotorye voprosy formirovaniya imidzhelogii kak nauki. Imidzhelogiya-2004. Sostoyanie, napravleniya, problemy. Materialy Vtorogo Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma po imidzhelogii/ pod red. E.A.Petrovoi – M.: RITs AIM, 2004.-380 s. http://academim.narod.ru/art/bel_1.html 13. Panasyuk A. I. Imidzh: opredelenie tsentral'nogo ponyatiya imidzhelogii. Doklad na otkrytom zasedanii prezidiuma akademii imidzhelogii 26.03.2004. http://academim.narod.ru/art/pan1_2.html 14. Perelygina E. B. Ponyatie imidzha. Psikhologiya imidzha. M.: Aspekt Press.2002. – 223 s. http://nashaucheba.ru/v30114/perelygina_e.b._psikhologiya_imidzha 15. Belobragin V.Ya., Belobragin V.V. Nekotorye voprosy formirovaniya imidzhelogii kak nauki. Imidzhelogiya-2004. Sostoyanie, napravleniya, problemy. Materialy Vtorogo Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma po imidzhelogii/ pod red. E.A.Petrovoi – M.: RITs AIM, 2004.-380 s. http://academim.narod.ru/art/bel_1.html 16. Bolotova N. P. Samoprezentatsiya-deyatel'nost', napravlennaya na sozdanie imidzha. Pedagogicheskaya informatika. Nauchno-metodicheskii zhurnal. Akademiya informatizatsii obrazovaniya. 2009. http://window.edu.ru/resource/918/67918/files/2009_3.pdf 17. Bird P. Sell Yourself. London, 1994. P. 1 18. Shepel' V. M. Imidzhelogiya: Sekrety lichnogo obayaniya. M.-Kul'tura i sport, YuNITI. 1994. S. 6.-320 s. 19. Nesterenko Elena Vladimirovna. Moda kak sposob simvolizatsii sotsial'nykh izmenenii i tendentsii ee institutsializatsii v sovremennom obshchestve: Na primere mody na zhenskuyu odezhdu. §2. MODA V SISTEME IMIDZhA. http://sci-book.com/moda/moda-sisteme-imidja.html 20. Petrov M. K. Yazyk. Znak. Kul'tura. Izd. 2-e, stereotipnoe. — M .: Editorial URSS, 2004. — 328 s. 21. A.S. Maidanov Bessoznatel'noe kak istochnik mifov: v chem pravy i v chem nepravy Freid i Yung // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 4. - C. 42 - 57. 22. N. B. Kirillova Chelovek i mif v prostranstve mediareal'nosti // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 2. - C. 78 - 86. 23. A.S. Nikitina Estetika bezobraznogo // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2010. - 6. - C. 66 - 71. |