|
Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Abgarjan D..
Relations between parties to a dispute and ITLOS
// Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations.
2014. № 2.
С. 287-293.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=64985
Abgarjan D.. Relations between parties to a dispute and ITLOS
Аннотация:
ITLOS case study shows that it strongly contributed to the development of the international law of the sea. Author considers such cases that allowed ITLOS to contribute to the provisions regarding preservation and protection of the marine environment, delimitation of the maritime boundary and responsibilities of the States. The author affirms that Tribunal contributed to progressive development of the law of the See. In its practical activity ITLOS has already made much for the development of the international law of the sea, especially in determination of those institutes and concepts, which were not clearly enough provided for in the Convention. The most demonstrative in this respect is the realization of the competence of prompt release of vessels which is quite new for judicial procedure. In realizing this competence ITLOS had to interpret and concretize many articles of the Convention, especially as to the grounds for detention of foreign vessels in the EEZ and other areas of national jurisdiction; cleared up such an important rule of national law as the amount of financial security for a release of a ship: the rule is borne by international law and being common for many national systems became actually a general principle of law.
Ключевые слова:
ITLOS, process verbal, acquiescence, marine environment, delimitation, responsibilities, Convention, Contribution, provisions regarding preservation, protection
Abstract: ITLOS case study shows that it strongly contributed to the development of the international law of the sea. Author
considers such cases that allowed ITLOS to contribute to the provisions regarding preservation and protection of the marine
environment, delimitation of the maritime boundary and responsibilities of the States. The author affi rms that Tribunal contributed
to progressive development of the law of the See. In its practical activity ITLOS has already made much for the development
of the international law of the sea, especially in determination of those institutes and concepts, which were not clearly enough
provided for in the Convention. The most demonstrative in this respect is the realization of the competence of prompt release
of vessels which is quite new for judicial procedure. In realizing this competence ITLOS had to interpret and concretize many
articles of the Convention, especially as to the grounds for detention of foreign vessels in the EEZ and other areas of national
jurisdiction; cleared up such an important rule of national law as the amount of fi nancial security for a release of a ship: the
rule is borne by international law and being common for many national systems became actually a general principle of law.
Keywords: ITLOS, process verbal, acquiescence, marine environment, delimitation, responsibilities, Convention, Contribution, provisions regarding preservation, protection.
Эта статья может быть бесплатно загружена в формате PDF для чтения. Обращаем ваше внимание на необходимость соблюдения авторских прав,
указания библиографической ссылки на статью при цитировании.
Скачать статью
Библиография
1. Gwenaele Rashbrooke, The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea — a forum for the Development of Principles of International Environmental Law, 19 Int'l J. Marine and Coastal Law, # 4, 523 (2004) at 532.
2. Robin Chirchill, The Bangladesh/Myanmar Case: Continuity and Novelty in the Law of Maritime Boundary Delimitation, Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, 2012, #1, p.150
3. А. А. Тодоров. Территориальный элемент состава пиратства по уголовному законодательству России и зарубежных стран // Право и политика. – 2012. – № 10. – С. 104-107.
4. М. Р. Хубиева. Конкуренция юрисдикций в случае предписания временных мер правовой защиты при разрешении международных морских споров // Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 2. – С. 104-107.
5. А. С. Касаткина. Правовые основы регулирования международных пассажирских перевозок // Право и политика. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 104-107.
6. Г. Ц. Ли. Морская политика Китая в регионе АТР // Национальная безопасность / nota bene. – 2012. – № 1. – С. 104-107.
7. С. Н. Овчинников. Пограничный контроль морских судов в Российской Федерации: законодательство и практика // Право и политика. – 2011. – № 12. – С. 104-107.
8. М. М. Каленченко. Территориальная охрана морской среды и свобода судоходства. // Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 2.
9. Ли Гуань цюнь. Китайская морская стратегия и политика на современном этапе // Политика и Общество. – 2011. – № 6. – С. 104-107.
10. В. Н. Конышев, А. А. Сергунин. Ремилитаризация Арктики и безопасность России // Национальная безопасность / nota bene. – 2011. – № 3. – С. 104-107.
11. Е. Б. Ганюшкина. Международный орган по морскому дну, Комиссия по границам континентального шельфа, Международный трибунал по морскому праву и некоторые другие международные объединения,связанные с Конвенцией ООН по морскому праву 1982 г. // Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 4.
12. А.М. Ибрагимов. Специфика норм о гарантиях в международном морском и речном праве // Право и политика. – 2009. – № 9.
13. Ерпылева Н.Ю. Международный коммерческий арбитраж: правовые основы функционирования // NB: Международное право. — 2013.-№ 1.-С.1-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.545. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_545.html
14. Каламкарян Р.А. Роль Международного Суда ООН в деле поддержания международного правопорядка // NB: Международное право. — 2013.-№ 1.-С.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
15. Каламкарян Р.А. Включенность Российской Федерации в деятельность Международного Суда ООН в деле обеспечения международной законности и правопорядка // NB: Международное право. — 2013.-№ 2.-С.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
16. Кузьмина Ю.А. Некоторые особенности практики Европейского Суда в отношении Российской Федерации // NB: Международное право. — 2013.-№ 3.-С.68-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.2424. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2424.ht
References
1. Gwenaele Rashbrooke, The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea — a forum for the Development of Principles of International Environmental Law, 19 Int'l J. Marine and Coastal Law, # 4, 523 (2004) at 532.
2. Robin Chirchill, The Bangladesh/Myanmar Case: Continuity and Novelty in the Law of Maritime Boundary Delimitation, Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, 2012, #1, p.150
3. A. A. Todorov. Territorial'nyi element sostava piratstva po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 10. – S. 104-107.
4. M. R. Khubieva. Konkurentsiya yurisdiktsii v sluchae predpisaniya vremennykh mer pravovoi zashchity pri razreshenii mezhdunarodnykh morskikh sporov // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
5. A. S. Kasatkina. Pravovye osnovy regulirovaniya mezhdunarodnykh passazhirskikh perevozok // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
6. G. Ts. Li. Morskaya politika Kitaya v regione ATR // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 104-107.
7. S. N. Ovchinnikov. Pogranichnyi kontrol' morskikh sudov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: zakonodatel'stvo i praktika // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – № 12. – S. 104-107.
8. M. M. Kalenchenko. Territorial'naya okhrana morskoi sredy i svoboda sudokhodstva. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 2.
9. Li Guan' tsyun'. Kitaiskaya morskaya strategiya i politika na sovremennom etape // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 104-107.
10. V. N. Konyshev, A. A. Sergunin. Remilitarizatsiya Arktiki i bezopasnost' Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
11. E. B. Ganyushkina. Mezhdunarodnyi organ po morskomu dnu, Komissiya po granitsam kontinental'nogo shel'fa, Mezhdunarodnyi tribunal po morskomu pravu i nekotorye drugie mezhdunarodnye ob''edineniya,svyazannye s Konventsiei OON po morskomu pravu 1982 g. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 4.
12. A.M. Ibragimov. Spetsifika norm o garantiyakh v mezhdunarodnom morskom i rechnom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – № 9.
13. Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnyi kommercheskii arbitrazh: pravovye osnovy funktsionirovaniya // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.1-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.545. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_545.html
14. Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
15. Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiiskoi Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoi zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
16. Kuz'mina Yu.A. Nekotorye osobennosti praktiki Evropeiskogo Suda v otnoshenii Rossiiskoi Federatsii // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.68-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.2424. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2424.ht
|
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
